This paper conducts an empirical probe on the function of institutional to state economic growing. In peculiar, this paper provides new grounds that shed visible radiation on the linkages between economic freedoms via the debt-growth theoretical account in a panel of 65 developing states. This research employs dynamic panel informations of System-GMM appraisal model growing within the period 1980-2009. The findings show that, the external debt and economic freedom are found to hold linkages on economic growing of the developing states. However, the estimated consequence besides reveals that the consequence of external debt on growing does non depend on the degree of economic freedom.

Over the past few decennaries, economic expert and policy shaper is extremely concerned on growth-related issue. Furthermore, in a decennary of high mobility of capital and labour, the chief challenge is to explicate policy that could bring forth a sustainable economic growing in a long skyline.[ 1 ]In world, with the uncertainness of daze and fluctuation events in the economic system, it is impossible for a state to enter an addition in economic growing continuously. Therefore, it is non merely about accomplishing economic growing twelvemonth on twelvemonth – it is besides depends on how a state maintains and stabilizes its economic place. On the item to bring forth sustainable economic growing, assorted factors have been considered in explicating constabularies including the function of external sector as the growing acceleration be given to be correlated with additions in investings and trade, and with existent exchange rate depreciation ( Hausmann, Pritchett and Rodrik, 2005 ) . The literature on economic growing depart from a cardinal basic theory on capital and labour creative activity, to the inclusion of institutional and political hazard factor as the economic system becomes more complex and diverse.

Based on standard neo-classical economic theory, capital- scarce states should borrow abroad to finance domestic investing. In add-on, external debt would be one of the beginnings of capital that would excite economic growing of most of the developing states. However, the consequence of external debt to bring forth state growing is still equivocal with no consensus emerging. Therefore, one might inquire, does the capital flight of external debt is associated with a dynamic growing in GDP? The additions of external debt by most of the development states are likely due to scarceness of resources in domestic economic system with the purposes to hike domestic investing and bring forth economic growing. However, the state of affairs becomes worse with several states have been trapped with high degree of external liability, therefore been classified as the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries ( HIPC ) . The HIPC enterprises that were launched in 1996 by the World Bank had raised the issue of whether the external adoption has been allocated expeditiously to investing. Therefore lead to the inquiry on the being of other factors in complementing and easing the debt-growth link in the underdeveloped economic systems.

One of import lessons to larn from the recent fiscal crisis in the late 2008, is that prudent macroeconomic policies should be supported by contributing political environment and authorities relevant statute law to hike domestic economic system ( UNECA, 2012 ) , of which highlighted the function of economic freedom to state growing. In peculiar, the function of economic institutional measured by state economic freedom could potentially explicate the mystifier of the negative debt-growth relationship. A well-functioning fiscal establishment would back up the investing environment clime therefore consequences in a positive impact of private capital flow including foreign debt on economic growing ( Choong et al. ( 2010 ) . In add-on, harmonizing to Miller and Foster ( 2012 ) , hapless policy picks, low investing freedom and bad fiscal direction are extremely likely to hold restrained the economic freedom therefore affect the function of external debt to hike state economic growing. Pattillo et Al. ( 2004 ) explain that the chief channel through which debt affects economic growing is the quality and efficiency of investing instead than its degree, because the exclusion of the investing rate from the growing arrested development does non alter significantly the inauspicious debt consequence. While the measure and productiveness of inputs either capital or labour will be influenced by the institutional environment ( Gwartney, Holcombe and Lawson, 2004 ) . Therefore, the economic freedom argues to be related with the state ‘s ability to expeditiously apportion the state external adoption to domestic investing, to a lesser extent the economic growing. This paper uses the index of economic freedom by Fraser Institute that covers five wide countries viz. , size of authorities, legal construction and security of belongings right, entree to sound money, freedom to merchandise internationally and ordinance of recognition, labour and concern. However, the literature on the function of economic freedom to state growing through the external debt has still been missing behind. Therefore, this paper tries to look into the linkages between the economic freedoms on the debt-growth theoretical account for the development states. To the writer ‘s cognition, none of the old literature has been conducted to analyse the function of economic freedom to debt-growth theoretical account, therefore this survey would lend to edify and enriched the literature on this country. This survey attempts to make full this spread in the literature. The paper is structured as follows. The following subdivision reviews the theoretical and empirical literature on the debt-growth theoretical account. Section 3 outlines the information and methodological analysis while the empirical consequences are presented in subdivision 4, and subdivision 5 concludes the paper.

LITERATURE REVIEW

The impression of state ‘s economic growing has take-off from the unfavorable judgment of mercantile system thought. The neoclassical growing theory developed by Solow ( 1956 ) , explain the mechanism of which the domestic economy financing the aggregative investing with labour-augmenting technological alteration is exogenic in finding the equilibrium growing of per capita end product. However, the neoclassical growing theoretical account ignores the possibility of interaction between states and the remainder of the universe. Meanwhile, Mankiw, Romer, and Weil ( 1992 ) further extend the Solow-Swan theoretical account to include human capital in the growing theoretical account by retaining the premise of changeless returns to scale in all inputs ( decreasing returns to physical and human capital ) . Recognizing the importance of capital flight to the developing economic systems, Otani and Villaneuva ( 1989 ) , Agenor ( 2000 ) , Villaneuva ( 2003 ) , and Mariano and Villaneuva ( 2006 ) initiates a growing theoretical account for the unfastened economic system that incorporated a planetary capital market function. Thus, highlight the function of external debt to hike state growing.

Otani and Villanueva ( 1989 ) developed a simple aggregative growing theoretical account in measuring the impact of macroeconomic policies on the long-run public presentation of a underdeveloped state. In peculiar, the theoretical account focuses on the capital accretion and the dynamic motion of external debt. Complementing by the development in human capital, the higher fringy merchandise of capital, it will increase the warranted rate of growing to a higher rate. In add-on the financial policy accommodation does non merely cut down the foreign debt load, by raising the capital effectual labour ratio, it besides has lasting positive growing consequence ( Agenor, 2000 ) . Meanwhile, the aggregative capital stock is defined as the accrued amount of domestic economy, planetary capital market, and net external adoption ( Villaneuva, 2003 ) . In add-on, the difference between the expected fringy merchandise capital, cyberspace of depreciation, and the fringy cost of financess in the international capital market find the proportionate rate of alteration in the external debt-capital ratio. Furthermore, Villaneuva ( 2003 ) added that when the expected net fringy merchandise of capital lucifers the fringy cost of financess at the equilibrium capital-labor ratio, the proportionate addition in net external debt is fixed by the economic system ‘s steady-state end product growing and the external debt to end product ratio stabilizes at a changeless degree. Meanwhile Mariano and Villaneuva ( 2006 ) correct the defect of the Villanueva ( 2003 ) where the theoretical account is unable to settle the steady-state external debt ratio that is consistent with maximal consumer public assistance. As such, on the balance growing way, Mariano and Villanaeuva ( 2006 ) choose the domestic nest eggs rates that maximize societal public assistance by maximising long-term ingestion per unit of effectual labour.

As been noted in earlier treatment, external debt is one of the beginnings of capital to hike domestic economic system. A state will see the positive consequence of external debt ; it has been expeditiously allocated to domestic investing. While excessively much of debt will could squash investings because returns are “ taxed off ” through debt service payment by foreign creditors. Furthermore, high degree of debts would negatively impact the rate of investing every bit good as state economic growing because of disincentive, hard currency flow and moral jeopardy effects ( Claessens, Detagiache, Kanbur, and Wickham 1997 ) . In add-on, if there is some likeliness that, in the hereafter, debt will be larger than the state ‘s repayment ability, the expected debt-service cost will deter further domestic and foreign investing ( Pattilio, Porison and Ricci, 2002 ) . Furthermore, harmonizing to Krugman ( 1988 ) , high debts have inauspicious effects on the economic growing and this state of affairs could be related to the debt-overhang theory. On the other point of position, despite positive or negative consequence, both consequence could perchance take topographic point in explicating the consequence of external, therefore related to the “ Laffer Curve ” . Laffer curve explains the relationship between the face value of debt and investing. If the outstanding debt increases beyond a threshold degree, the expected refund begins to fall as a effect of inauspicious consequence. In other words, on the upward-sloping or good subdivision curve the deduction is that an addition in the face value of debt is associated with an addition in expected refund up to a threshold degree. Along the bad subdivision of the “ Laffer Curve ” , an addition in the face value of debt reduces expected payment.

On the other manus, over the past decennaries, faculty members and policy-makers have shown consistent involvement in and have made attempts to look into and develop the theory on the nexus between debt and economic growing. However, to utmost of the writer cognition, none of the old survey considered economic freedom in the debt-growth theoretical account. Previous empirical grounds has found assorted consequences to back up the debt- growing relationship. Chowdhury ( 2001 ) , Clements et Al. ( 2003 ) , Mohamed ( 2005 ) , Wijeweera et Al. ( 2005 ) and Sen et Al. ( 2007 ) find grounds to back up the negative consequence of external debt on a state ‘s economic growing. Thus, an addition in the stock of debt has a negative impact on economic growing. Previous empirical plants done by Choong et Al. ( 2010 ) suggest that external debt has a negative consequence on Malaysia long-term economic growing. Furthermore, the Granger causality trial besides reveals the being of short-term causality linkages between external debt and economic growing. Meanwhile, Pattilio et Al. ( 2004 ) , Cordella et Al. ( 2005 ) , and Imbs and Ranciere ( 2005 ) happen non-linearity in the debt-growth relationship. Furthermore, Patillio et Al. ( 2004 ) study that the mean impact of debt on per capita growing appears to go negative for debt degrees above 160 to 170 per centum of exports and 35 to 40 per centum of GDP. Clements et Al. ( 2003 ) suggest that, above the threshold of 20-25 per centum of GDP and 101-105 per centum of exports, external debt is associated with lower rates of growing for 55 low income states.

Meanwhile the detonation involvement on look intoing the impact of economic freedom to growing started in the early 2000 ‘s with several innovators empirical plants taking topographic point supported by the handiness of informations and measuring of the economic freedom index. Lawson ( 2006 ) , Gwartney et Al. ( 2004 ) , Dawson ( 2003 ) , Heckelman and Stroup ( 2000 ) , Heckelman ( 2000 ) , conducted survey on the impact of economic freedom to growing Gwartney et Al. ( 2004 ) examine the linkages between economic freedom and economic growing for 99 states. The consequences indicate a positive relationship among economic freedom, investing rate and state GDP. Furthermore, the positive affect of economic freedom is besides associated with productiveness of investing. On the other manus, Dawson ( 2003 ) , Heckelman and Stroup ( 2000 ) and Heckelman ( 2000 ) look into the impact of different constituent of economic freedom index on state economic growing. With a survey conducted by Heckelmann ( 2000 ) found that the degree of economic freedom precedes growing while growing causal some of the economic freedom constituent viz. ,

METHODOLGY

A standard basic growing theoretical account, for state I at clip T:

( 3 )

Where is a log of existent percapita GDP, is a N x P matrix of p explanatory variables, is the vector of unseen country-specific consequence, and is the error term and is assumed to be usually distributed. Real GDP per capita ( dependent variable ) as a placeholder of economic growing while the independent variable includes external debt, economic freedom index population growing, investing ratio and life anticipation to represents the rates of growing of factor inputs in the production map. In add-on, this paper employs a dynamic panel informations of Generalized Method of Moments ( GMM ) , GMM- System model to analyze the function of economic freedom in the debt-growth theoretical account. In peculiar, GMM-system calculators would profit the appraisal at least in two-folds ; utile in commanding for state specific consequence and commanding potency of endogeneity in panel appraisal. Arellano and Bond ( 1991 ) take- off from the basic thought of taking the first differences to extinguish the unseen consequence ( state particular ) in the dynamic panel theoretical account as follows:

( 5 )

In add-on, Arellano Bond ( 1991 ) besides proposed a lagged ( lagged two and farther ) used as instruments to extinguish the possibility of endogeneity and simultaneousness prejudice. However, Blundell and Bond ( 1998 ) point out some disagreement ; in a instance where explanatory variable are persist, the lagged degrees of the explanatory variable is weak instruments. On the other spectrum, work done by Arellano and Bover ( 1995 ) proposed an alternate appraisal which added the flat equation to the difference equation resulted in a a system estiamation, viz. GMM-system. Furthermore, Blundell and Bover ( 1998 ) supply a Monte Carlo simulation that shows that the GMM-system calculators perform better than the GMM-difference calculator and would be able to cut down prejudices. Therefore GMM-system calculator performs minute status. As such, the undermentioned minute conditions as proposed by Arellano and Bond ( 1991 ) to cipher the difference calculator

for ( 6 )

for ( 7 )

While the extra minute conditions for the arrested development in degree as

for ( 8 )

for ( 9 )

Therefore by uniting the ( 6 ) , ( 7 ) , and ( 8 ) , ( 9 ) , the GMM-system calculator is obtained. We test the cogency of the minute conditions by the conventional trial of over-identifying limitations proposed Hansen ( 1982 ) and Arellano and Bond ( 1991 ) method, that proving the void hypothesis that the remainders from the estimated arrested development is non second-order serially correlated.

Datas are collected from assorted beginnings for the period of 1980 to 2009 from World Development Indicator ( WDI ) and Global Development Financial ( GDF ) index by the World Bank ( WB ) database, Penn Wu Table Version 7 by Alan Heston, Robert Summers and Bettina Aten ( 2011 ) and Economic Freedom index by Fraser Institute.

Empirical RESULTS

Table 1 shows a preliminary overview on the consequence of external debt and economic freedom on economic growing. The consequence indicates that the external debt has negative impact on economic growing at important at 5 per centum significance degree. The consequence is expected since most of the old reported surveies of ( thirty ) have discovered a negative impact of external debt on state economic growing. In add-on, the economic freedom contributed positively to economic growing of the developing states. Therefore highlight the importance of economic freedom to hike state capital accretion activity ( i.e via external debt ) as it attract more foreign capital, accelerate state investing, to a lesser extent economic growing. On the other manus, despites the negative and important ( at 5 per centum significance degree ) consequence of population growing to economic growing, the investing, life anticipation and initial income are found to hold positive impact on the economic systems of developing states. Furthermore, the consequences appraisal passed the Arellano-Bond and Hansen specification trial suggest that the calculators are utilizing a valid instrument and the extra instruments of the GMM-system are right.

Table 1: The growing consequence of external debt and economic freedom

Variable

Coefficient

p-value

Log ( initial income )

0.690

( 0.106 )

0.000

Population growing

-0.092

( 0.039 )

0.017

Log ( life anticipation )

1.714

( 0.546 )

0.001

Investing ratio

0.025

( 0.007 )

0.000

External debt

-0.001

( 0.000 )

0.004

Economic Freedom

0.063

( 0.026 )

0.017

Changeless

14.778

( 31.709 )

0.641

AR ( 2 ) trial

0.122

J-test

0.512

Notes: The figures reported for the AR ( 2 ) trial and J-test are the p-values. J-test is the Hansen overidentification trial while AR ( 2 ) is trial of second- order residuary consecutive correlativity. Number in bracket represents the heterokedasticity-robust criterion mistake.

We besides estimate the interaction term of external debt and economic freedom to capture the eventuality in the relationship between external debt and economic growing. Table 2 shows the consequence. The coefficient of the interaction term is undistinguished, indicates that the fringy consequence of external debt on growing does non depend on the degree of economic freedom. On the other manus, consequences found on the specification trial, proposing that a valid specification without an over-identifying job exist in the estimated theoretical account.

Table 2: The interaction specification between external debt and economic freedom

Variable

Coefficient

p-value

Log ( initial income )

0.6766

( 0.1086 )

0.000

Population growing

-0.0902

( 0.0387 )

0.020

Log ( life anticipation )

1.6991

( 0.5298 )

0.001

Investing ratio

0.0230

( 0.0075 )

0.002

External debt

-0.0003

( 0.0021 )

0.872

Economic freedom

0.0850

( 0.0489 )

0.082

External debt x Economic freedom

-0.0003

( 0.0005 )

0.609

Changeless

9.9979

( 31.612 )

0.752

AR ( 2 ) trial

0.143

J-test

0.421

Notes: The figures reported for the AR ( 2 ) trial and J-test are the p-values. J-test is the Hansen overidentification trial while AR ( 2 ) is trial of second- order residuary consecutive correlativity. Number in bracket represents the heterokedasticity-robust criterion mistake.

This paper further estimates the constituents of economic freedom in the debt-growth economic theoretical account. Table 3 show consequences of the linkages between the constituents of economic freedom in the debt-growth theoretical account. The consequence shows a robust grounds of negative consequence of external debt to economic growing. In add-on, economic freedom constituent of authorities size and ordinance on recognition, labour and concern show a important ( at 5 per centum significance ) consequence to state economic growing at negative and positive consequence severally. Intuitively, it can be said that the bigger the size of authorities measured by authorities outgo, subsides and transportations given, are associated with lower economic growing frailty versa. In add-on the ordinance on recognition, labour and concern are found to hold positive linkages with state economic growing. Thus suggest that high economic freedom peculiarly on the recognition, labour and concern ordinance would supply inducement, less barrier and contributing environment to pull foreign human and capital every bit good as on the efficiency of the capital flow to be allocated to investing. On the other manus, consequences found on the specification trial suggest that the appraisal is free from simultaneousness prejudice and the theoretical account is right specified.

Table 3: The growing consequence of external debt and economic freedom constituent

Variable

Coefficient

p-value

Log ( initial income )

0.835

( 0.134 )

0.000

Population growing

0.099

( 0.083 )

0.230

Log ( life anticipation )

0.912

( 0.705 )

0.196

Investing ratio

0.036

( 0.011 )

0.002

External debt

-0.001

( 0.000 )

0.004

GOV

-0.099

( 0.046 )

0.031

LEGAL

0.059

( 0.052 )

0.254

Money

-0.014

( 0.017 )

0.405

TRADEF

-0.043

( 0.078 )

0.585

REGULATE

0.149

( 0.072 )

0.040

Changeless

-135.63

( 98.043 )

0.167

AR ( 2 ) trial

0.342

J-test

0.257

Notes: The figures reported for the AR ( 2 ) trial and J-test are the p-values. J-test is the Hansen overidentification trial while AR ( 2 ) is trial of second- order residuary consecutive correlativity. Number in bracket represents the heterokedasticity-robust criterion mistake.

To supply an extra penetration on the linkages between the external debt, economic freedom and economic growing, this paper split the sample into income categorization by World Bank viz. the in-between income and low income states. Table 4 presents the consequence of the linkages between external debt, economic freedom and economic growing based on the income categorization. The consequences show that the external debt and economic freedom variable are found to hold important consequence on economic growing. In add-on, the initial income, investing rate, life anticipation and are found to hold positive impact on the in-between income economic systems. Surprisingly, there is no grounds found on the impact of external debt and economic freedom on state economic growing of low income economic systems. While the consequences appraisal passed the Arellano-Bond and Hansen specification trial suggest that the calculators are utilizing a valid instrument and the extra instruments of the GMM-system are right.

An in-depth analysis on the linkages of external debt, economic freedom and economic growing is provided with the sub constituent of economic freedom for the in-between and low income states. The important consequence of initial income, life anticipation and investing ratio are found to be consistent as old estimated consequences. Furthermore, the consequence of external debt is negatively important on economic growing. The consequence shows a robust grounds of negative consequence of external debt to economic growing. Economic freedom constituent of authorities size and ordinance on recognition, labour and concern show a negative and important ( at 10 per centum significance ) consequence to state economic growing. In add-on the ordinance on recognition, labour and concern are found to hold positive linkages with state economic growing. This implies that the important consequence of the economic freedom constituent by developing states is preponderantly among the in-between income economic systems.

Table 4: The growing consequence of external debt and economic freedom by income categorization

Variable

Coefficient

p-value

Coefficient

p-value

In-between income states

Log ( initial income )

0.710

( 0.096 )

0.000

0.6863

( 0.061 )

0.000

Population growing

-0.048

( 0.040 )

0.220

-0.0200

( 0.045 )

0.658

Log ( life anticipation )

1.013

( 0.311 )

0.001

0.8559

( 0.307 )

0.005

Investing ratio

0.023

( 0.005 )

0.000

0.0202

( 0.004 )

0.000

External debt

-0.001

( 0.000 )

0.000

-0.0012

( 0.000 )

0.000

Economic Freedom

0.051

( 0.026 )

0.050

GOV

-0.0502

( 0.028 )

0.071

LEGAL

0.0065

( 0.021 )

0.759

Money

-0.0098

( 0.012 )

0.413

TRADEF

0.0265

( 0.024 )

0.266

REGULATE

0.0832

( 0.039 )

0.034

Changeless

-26.181

32.214

0.416

-29.991

( 24.834 )

0.227

AR ( 2 ) trial

0.142

0.746

J-test

0.438

0.518

Low income states

Log ( initial income )

1.092

( 0.534 )

0.041

2.5223

( 1.315 )

0.055

Population growing

0.226

( 0.385 )

0.556

0.0577

( 0.240 )

0.810

Log ( life anticipation )

-0.947

( 1.120 )

0.398

3.0832

( 4.573 )

0.500

Investing ratio

0.031

( 0.034 )

0.910

0.0694

( 0.065 )

0.285

External debt

0.000

( 0.001 )

0.990

0.0059

( 0.009 )

0.519

Economic Freedom

0.084

( 0.082 )

0.304

GOV

-0.2738

( 0.598 )

0.647

LEGAL

0.1089

( 0.234 )

0.641

Money

-0.0455

( 0.110 )

0.679

TRADEF

-0.2272

( 0.330 )

0.492

REGULATE

0.4255

( 0.557 )

0.445

Changeless

-66.45

( 92.363 )

0.472

88.5751

( 205.92 )

0.667

AR ( 2 ) trial

0.383

0.938

J-test

0.345

0.901

Notes: The figures reported for the AR ( 2 ) trial and J-test are the p-values. J-test is the Hansen overidentification trial while AR ( 2 ) is trial of second- order residuary consecutive correlativity. Number in bracket represents the heterokedasticity-robust criterion mistake.

Decision

This purpose of this paper is to look into the linkages between the economic freedoms on the debt-growth theoretical account for the 65 developing states. Consequences found that an accretion of external debt is associated with a lag in the economic systems of the developing states. In add-on, we besides find grounds on the linkages between economic freedom and economic growing. On the other manus, the estimated consequence besides reveals that the consequence of external debt on growing does non depend on the degree of economic freedom, therefore suggest weak relationship between economic freedom and external debt in the growing theoretical account. On the other manus, the constituent of economic freedom viz. , the authorities size and the ordinance of recognition, labour and concern contributed significantly to state economic growing. In peculiar, economic freedom constituents of authorities size are found to hold negative linkages with the economic growing while less ordinance on recognition, labour and concern would better state economic growing. Despite the important consequence of external debt and economic freedom on growing for the middle-income states, there is no grounds found on the impact of external debt and economic freedom on state economic growing of low income economic systems.

Mentions

Agenor, P. ( 2000 ) . The economic sciences of accommodation and growing, United Kingdom: Harvard

University Press.

Blundell, R. , and Bond, S. ( 1998 ) . Initial conditions and minute limitations in

dynamic panel informations theoretical account. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115-143.

Bohn, H. ( 1998 ) . The behavior of U.S. public debt and shortage. Quarterly Journal of

Economicss, 113, 949-963.

Chemical bond, S. R. , Hoeffler, A. , and Temple, J.R.W. ( 2001 ) . GMM appraisal of empirical

growing theoretical account ( CEPR Discussion Paper 3048 ) .

Choong, C. K. , Lau, E. , Liew, V. K. , & A ; Puah, C. H. ( 2010 ) . Does debts further economic

growing? The experience of Malaysia. African Journal of Business Management, 4, 1564-1575.

Chowdhury, A. R. ( 2001 ) . External debt and growing in developing states: A

sensitiveness and causal analysis ( World Institute for Developing Economic Research

Discussion Paper 2001/95 ) .

Claessens, S. , and Detagiache, E. , Kanbur, R. , and Wickham, P. ( 1997 ) . HIPC ‘s debt

reappraisal of the issue. Journal of African Economics, 6, 231-254.

Clements, B. , Bhattacharya, R. & A ; Nguyen, T. Q. ( 2003 ) . External debt, public investing

and growing in low-income states ( IMF Working Paper, WP/03/249 ) . Washington

District of columbia: IMF.

Gwartney, J.D. , Holcombe, R.G. , and Lawson, R.A. ( 2004 ) . Economic Freedom,

instituitional quality, and cross-country differences in encome and growing. Cato

Journal, 24, 205-233.

Hausmann, R. , Pritchett, L. , and Rodrik, D. ( 2005 ) . Growth accelerations. Journal of

Economic Growth, 10, 303-329.

Heston, A. , Summers, R. , and Aten, B. ( 2011 ) . Penn World Table Version 7.0, Center for

International Comparisons of Production, Income and Monetary values at the University of

Pennsylvania.

Heckelmann, J.C. ( 2000 ) . Economic freedom and economic growing: A short- tally causal

probe. Journal of Applied Economics, 3, 71-91.

Heckelmann, J.C. , and Stroup, M.D. ( 2000 ) . Which economic freedom contributes to

growing? . Kyklos, 53, 527-544.

Krugman, P. ( 1988 ) . Financing vs. forgiving a debt overhang. Journal of

Development Economics, 29, 253-268.

Mankiw, N. G. , Romer, D. , and Weil, D. ( 1992 ) . A part to the empirics of

economic growing. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 407-437.

Mariano, R.S. , and Villanueva, D. ( 2006 ) . External debt, accommodation and growing ( SMU

Economicss and Statistics Working Paper Series, 13 ) .

Miller, T. , and Foster, J.D. ( 2012 ) . Public debt, economic freedom and growing. In Miller,

T. , Holmes, K.R. , and Feulner, E.J ( Eds. ) , The 2012 Index of Economic Freedom

( pp45-55 ) . New York: The Heritage Foundation

Otani, I. , and Villaneuva, D. ( 1989 ) . Theoretical facets of growing in developing

states: External debt moral force and the function of human capital. IMF Staff Paper, 36,

307-342.

Pattillo, C. , Poirson, H. , and Ricci, L. ( 2002 ) External debt and growing ( IMF Working

Paper WP/02/69 ) . Washington, DC: IMF.

Sen, S. , Kasibhatla, M. , & A ; Stewart, D. B. ( 2007 ) . Debt overhang and economic Growth –

The Asian and the Latin America experiences. Economic System, 31, 3-11.

Solow, R.M. ( 1956 ) . A part of the theory of economic growing. Quarterly Journal

of Economics, 70, 65-94.

United Nations Economic and Social Council Economic Commission for Africa

( UNECA ) . ( 2012 ) . Impact of the European debt crisis on Africa ‘s economic system: UNECA

background paper, Ethiopia.

Villaneuva, D. ( 2003 ) . External debt, capital accretion and growing ( SMU-SESS

Discussion Paper Series in economic surveies ) .

Wijeweera, A. , Dollery, B. , & A ; Pathberiya, P. ( 2005 ) . Economic growing and external debt

service: A cointegration analysis of Sri Lanka, 1952 to 2002 ( University of New

England Working Paper Series in Economics 8 ) .

World Bank ( 2012 ) , World DataBank, World Development Indicators ( WDI ) and Global

Development Finance ( GDF ) .