The narrative of “ Babylon Revisited ” , is all about the male parent who tries to recover his girl detention after his recovery from his Wife ‘s decease and alcohol addiction. After constructing stock investing at the times of great bull market, Charlie who is the chief character moved to Paris with his married woman discontinuing his old occupation. His married woman subsequently died due to household jobs, Charlie ‘s alcohol addiction and the wild life style of the twosome. At this clip of torment, when Charlie was admitted to a sanatorium due to his intoxicant dependence, his girl went to life in Paris with her female parent ‘s sister. After his release from, the sanatorium, he so moved to Paraguay where once more he re-established himself as a concern individual once more.
What happens to Charlie in the narrative is merely a lesson that, though persons might alter, they might ne’er be free from their yesteryear. Their yesteryear will go on stalking them whenever they are. Even though he looks as if he is reformed, his ways still shows that, his past wickednesss had non moved off from him, intending that, his past wickednesss had non forgiven him yet. This is based on the fact that, there are those who had lost religions in him, and they are non ready to forgive and hold their religion back to him.
Though it seems he has changed, but I still keep some reserves against him excessively. I still look at him as a individual who is still under passage. It is a affair of understanding but, the world is that, he was non used to alcohol and drug maltreatment. He is still at the meeting point because ; he still has some witting which keeps on reminding him that he needs some aid. He knows it is right thing that needs to be done, yet, boulder clay he announces to everybody present that he is faced with a job, but for true alteration, he is non yet ready. I come to recognize this at the beginning and at the terminal of the narrative, while he is in the saloon, ( Nutshell, 2011 ) .
At the beginning of the narrative, he was in the saloon charting about his yesteryear, his narrative was about his old dealingss and wealth. At that clip, he had reduced imbibing drastically. “ I spoiled this metropolis for myself. I did n’t recognize it, but the yearss came along one after another, and so two old ages were gone, and everything was gone, and I was gone ” ( Scott, 2008 ) . As a ground, he had a good paying occupation, even ; he had made good programs of engaging a governess, who will plus in after deriving his girl ‘s detention. On the other manus, his head of go forthing a note to his old friend, his concluding committedness to go forth past life, was non yet made by his witting. Now, linking this with what happens at the terminal of the narrative, he is seen in the saloon once more. This action brings out the point that, he is non yet reformed. This is based on the fact that, he is still divided between his past ways and his coveted ways. To turn out this, one of the subjects identified in the novel is Charlie ‘s split individuality. I noticed assorted cases in the book that can turn out that, Charlie had a really unsmooth clip remaining off from his yesteryear. From the page one, it is evidenced that, Charlie starts inquiring about his old brothers. “ And where ‘s Mr. Campbell? ” ( Scott, 2008 ) . The fact is, if Charlie intended to hold a changed hereafter and ready to populate anew life, he would non hold done many things he was making. As affair of fact, he was merely contending with the past life and the present life, but had non taken any determination.
In decision, at really first clip I read this book, I truly sympathized with protagonist Charlie ; I had a batch of empathy upon him. This was based on the fact that, I truly looked as a hapless adult male, who has been continuously been at the brunt of bad deficiency. I thought bad lucks were ever following him. On the surface, Charlie looked like the adult male who was seeking to decide his past life, but everything was merely hitting complications in all his stairss. At this degree, I truly empathized with him. However, after traveling deeper into the book, I started oppugning my old attitude and logical thinking. One of the uncertainties that appeared was, was Charlie consciously or subconsciously undermining his opportunities of acquiring back his lone girl back before she ends up being tainted for good? In the book, I so realized that Charlie was non merely a adult male with bad lucks, but his was besides making his ain bad lucks. The first clip this appears openly is in the initial pages of the book, when he left Lincoln and Marion Peter ‘s reference for Duncan, who happened to be his best old friend. The world is, if he truly wanted to do his life turn a unit of ammunition, such an action would non hold been taken. I can easy acquire the ground for such an action, which is, Charlie is merely a animal of wont. “ When he turned into the saloon he travelled the 20 pess of green rug with his eyes fixed directly in front by old wont ; and so, with his pes steadfastly on the rail, he turned and surveyed the room, meeting merely a individual brace of eyes that fluttered up from a newspaper in the corner ” ( Scott, 2008 ) .