Over the old ages at that place has been a batch of argument on the similarities and differences between direction and leading. Weathersby ( 1999 ) argued that “management is the allotment of scarce resources against an organization’s aim. the scene of precedences. the design of work and the accomplishment of results” whereas leading “focuses on the creative activity of a common vision” . Schruijer and Vansina ( 1999 ) proposed that direction is about “doing things right” and leading is “doing the right things” . Both surveies appear to see the direction map as an administrative function while puting the leading map as a airy function. Locander. Luechauer. and Pope ( 2007 ) support this impression by reasoning that leading is like theatre and that the leader is the seeable manifestation of an organization’s or project’s success or failure.
Therefore. he or she must prosecute the followings to believe in and accomplish a coveted result “By paying attending to what people want and expect. and by seeking for solutions to jobs. the leader can move suitably and carry through the coveted role” ( Locander. et. Al. 2007 ) . Lichtenstein. Bien. Marion. Seers. Orton. and Schreiber ( 2006 ) added a relational dimension to their definition of leading saying that “leadership is an emergent event. an result of relational interactions among agents…leadership emerges through dynamic interactions” . Having a background in Communication Studies. I besides look at how relationships affect the definition of both leading and direction.
Effective leading and direction consequences in the accomplishment of ends ; quality leading and direction physiques and sustains working relationships in the procedure of accomplishing those ends. Having this apprehension. I define leading as making and keeping relationships in such a manner that it motivates people to accomplish personal and shared ends. Management. in bend. raisings those relationships and bridges the perpendicular spread in organisational construction. “The critical resource of most concerns is no longer capital but the people a company hires. motivates and develops” ( Karp. 2006 ) .
Good leaders should animate people to desire to break themselves foremost and so utilize that esteem to break their external environment ( i. e. the organisation or the undertaking at manus ) . Chen ( 2006 ) provinces “Business is frequently a roller coaster of highs and depressions. Therefore it is to be expected that high public presentation leaders are more skilled at actuating themselves and others in disputing situations” . Here. Chen alludes to a cardinal factor in good leading and that is the leader’s ego regard. Malhotra. Majchrzak. and Rosen ( 2007 ) propose that a leader is responsible for “articulating a vision for the squad. pass oning the vision with passion. puting an executing program so the vision can be accomplished. organizing alliances of trusters. alining others behind the vision. and determining a squad civilization by jointing runing values” . In order for a leader to make the above-referenced points. he or she must hold high moral criterions and a positive self-image to demand such responsibilities.
The Bible affirms that good leading is rooted in high moral criterions. Peter 3:8-11 reads “Finally. [ be ye ] all of one head. holding compassion one of another. love as brethren. [ be ] pathetic. [ be ] gracious: Not rendering immorality for immorality. or inveighing for railing: but contrariwise approval ; cognizing that ye are thereunto called. that ye should inherit a approval. For he that will love life. and see good yearss. allow him forbear his lingua from immorality. and his lips that they speak no craft: Let him shun immorality. and do good ; allow him seek peace. and ensue it” .
Chen. J. ( 2006 ) . International Corporate Highfliers: What Makes Them Tick. British Journal of Administrative Management. 52. 26-27.
Karp. T. ( 2006 ) . Transforming Administrations For Organic Growth: The Deoxyribonucleic acid of Change Leadership. Journal of Change Management. 6. 3-20.
Lichtenstein. B. . Uhl-Bien. M. . Marion. R. . Seers. A. . Orson. J. . & A ; Schreiber. C. ( 2006 ) . Complexity Leadership Theory: An Interactive Perspective On Leading In Complex Adaptive Systems. Emergence: Complexity & A ; Organization. 8. 2-12.
Locander. W. . Luechauer. D. . & A ; Pope. J. ( 2007 ) . Leadership Is Like Theater. Marketing Management. 16. 45-47.
Malhotra. A. . Majchrzak. A. . & A ; Rosen. B. ( 2007 ) . Leading Virtual Teams. Academy of Management Perspectives. 21. 60-70.
Schruijer. S. and Vansina. L. ( 1999 ) . Leadership and Organization Change: An Introduction. European Journal of Work & A ; Organizational Psychology. 8. 1-8.
Weathersby. G. ( 1999 ) . Leadership vs. Management. Management Review. 88. 5.