In this paper I will seek to explicate and give grounds why Mrs. Mallard from “ The Story of an Hour ” is one of the most absorbing characters in Chopin ‘s literature. In this short narrative the chief character Mrs. Mallard experiences ephemeral feelings about her hubby ‘s decease, who preliminary is supposed to hold been killed in a railroad accident. At the beginning of the narrative the readers are misguided to believe that Mrs. Mallard “ was afflicted with a bosom problem ” ( Chopin 2009 ) . Within the context “ bosom problem ” has a dual significance. We may take the actual significance which is that so Mrs. Mallard is enduring from a bosom disease. The other would be that she was concealing her interior feelings and esthesiss. One of the readings why Mrs. Mallard is presented as such a at odds character prevarication in the fact that Chopin wrote her narrative in a historical minute where adult females had less picks and freedom and they were non able to disassociate. Therefore it was unable to unwrap any feelings about the awaited freedom that Mrs. Mallard would derive after her hubby ‘s decease.

“ She did non hear the narrative as many adult females have heard the same, with a paralytic inability to accept its significance ( Chopin 2009 ) . ” Mrs. Mallard did non hear what had happened to her hubby and she was non even paralyzed. The readers are led to believe that Mrs. Mallard did non hear the intelligence because it was a flooring one. Then, we are amazed how fast the “ storm of heartache ” has passed. The primary emotional reaction of Mrs. Mallard demonstrates the deep disclosure about how this event would afflict her future life.

First, the intelligence about her hubby ‘s decease is lay waste toing. The unfastened window – a symbol of freedom is in disagreement with the “ physical exhaustion ” of her organic structure. The picturesque puting that is described helps the reader realize that Mrs. Mallard might non be so sad and unhappy of the intelligence. The colour contrasts employed – “ new spring life ” , “ bluish sky ” have positive and reassuring influence. Life is altering for the better and new chances are coming to Mrs. Mallard. The “ comfy, spacious armchair ” is a symbol of freedom, security and alleviation. The facial characteristics speak that she “ was immature ” , nevertheless the line on her face indicate hidden “ repression ” . For the first clip we are introduced to the possibility that Mrs. Mallard had an unhappy matrimony. In 1890s when the short narrative was written adult females were non allowed to disassociate and it was a societal norm to remain married, even if this caused discontented feelings in the spouses.

Mrs. Mallard is characterized as strong and intelligent. “ There was something coming to her and she was waiting for it, fearfully. What was it? She did non cognize ; it was excessively elusive and elusive to call. But she felt it, crawling out of the sky, making toward her through the sounds, the aromas, the colour that filled the air ( Chopin 2009 ) . ” Reading the narrative for the first clip, we think that the external something that is coming is her ain decease. However at 2nd glimpse we see that this is her freedom and the realisation that she is at least free at her will. All her life she was populating for her hubby. Now that he is gone she can believe for the first clip for herself.

Recognizing her freedom Mrs. Mallard is afraid to let herself to be happy. She is endeavoring “ to crush it back at her will ” . Chopin attractively reflects the powerless place of adult females and how Mrs. Mallard ‘s matrimonial duties constructed her as “ a merchandise ” of the societal and economic fortunes of the late nineteenth century.

Mrs. Mallard wants to be independent, and the lone manner for that is to be a widow. This is non barbarous, this is the late nineteenth century world. Society controls her actions and ideas and she is “ abandoned ” . To seek freedom is inappropriate, she is a married adult female. She is abandoned in the fanciful imprisonment that society doomed her at. She is non permitted to get away physically from society, but she can get away emotionally, because she is free of the control imposed by others and by her hubby. That is why “ a small whispered word escaped from her somewhat parted lips ( Chopin 2009 ) . The awaited word is repeated three times “ free, free, free ” . We can detect the contrast between “ small ” and “ free ” . The writer efforts to minimize the significance of “ freedom ” , because society will non allow her to the full the freedom. May be she will be obliged to remarry? By reiterating the word she is doing it look more realistic. The emotional elation is in unison with the sensualness which is transferred to her organic structure – “ her pulsations beat fast ” , her blood is “ warmed ” and every inch of her organic structure “ relaxed ” .

Once once more we are introduced by negative sentence. “ She did non halt to inquire if it were or were non a monstrous joy ( Chopin 2009 ) . ” The reader is confused and may be Judgess her for the joy at the decease of her hubby. However, the oxymoron “ monstrous joy ” discloses that Mrs. Mallard is a sort and honest individual and the joy she feels is echt, but incompatible with her interior sense of attitude. However, “ she knew that she would cry once more when she saw the sort, stamp custodies folded in decease ( Chopin 2009 ) ” . His suggest that society expects from her to act like that – to mourn and to cry and she would make it, because this would be considered her natural reaction. Mrs. Mallard already sees “ a long emanation of old ages that would belong to her perfectly ( Chopin 2009 ) . Here the writer openly expresses the ground why Mrs. Mallard feels this manner about her hubby ‘s decease. “ There would be no powerful will flexing hers in that unsighted continuity with which work forces and adult females believe they have a right to enforce a private will upon a fellow-creature ( Chopin 2009 ) ” . These descriptions explain what the domestic life of Mrs. Mallard ‘s was like. She was unhappy in her matrimony. She followed the desires of her hubby who controlled her, she was non able to give her ain