In this paper we will do secret plan and construction analysis of a short narrative by Flannery O’Connor “ Good State Peoples ” , point of position analysis of “ A Rose for Emily ” by William Faulkner and the theme analysis of Franz Kafka “ The Metamorphosis ” .

No affair, how wise you consider yourself to be, there ever are people, who can flim-flam you. It may hold no serious results, or may ensue in decease – such as it is shown in a short narrative by Flannery O’Connor.

The secret plan of this narrative, as any other, has an expounding, complications, flood tide and denouement. In expounding we can see a figure of chief characters of the narrative: Mrs. Freeman, the retainer amah, Mrs. Hopewell, her kept woman, and Mrs. Hopewell ‘s girl Joy. The other two characters – two girls of Mrs. Freeman, are non introduced in the narrative in individual. We merely know that they are at that place someplace by histories of their female parent.

Mrs. Freeman, harmonizing to Mrs. Hopewell, was a “ good state people ” and “ a lady ” whom Mrs. Hopewell “ was ne’er ashamed to take her anyplace or present her to anybody they might run into ” ( O’Connor, 1955 ) . Her two girls Glynese and Carramae, were, by words of Mrs. Hopewell “ were two of the finest misss she knew ” ( O’Connor, 1955 ) .

Hopewell ‘s girl, Joy ( subsequently she changed her name to Hulga ) , was 32 old ages old and had a Ph.D. grade in doctrine. She was “ a big blonds [ sic ] miss ” ( O’Connor, 1955 ) , had merely one leg ( the other was shot off in the tragic hunting accident ) and considered herself to be really smart. But her female parent regarded her merely as a mere kid.

Mrs. Hopewell can be easy described in footings of her three favourite expressions – Nothing is perfect ” , “ That is life! ” and “ good, other people have their sentiments excessively ” ( O’Connor, 1955 ) . Mrs. Hopewell was the sort of a adult female who could maintain up with about any individual without struggles. As her family name indicates, she was trusting for everything to be good.

Complications begin, when in the house of Mrs. Hopewell appears a immature adult male, a Bible marketer. He said his name was Manley Pointer and he was a true Christian. To Mrs. Hopewell he appeared to be so sincere, that, though at first she was non pleased to see him, subsequently she had to acknowledge that ‘he bored me to decease but he was so sincere and echt I could n’t be ill-mannered to him. He was merely good state people, you know, ” she said, “ – merely the salt of the Earth ” ( O’Connor, 1955 ) . The flood tide of the narrative is the talk between Pointer and Hulga after which they decide to run into the following twenty-four hours to travel on a field day. She imagine scoring the immature naA?ve male child, but in the denouement of that narrative it was smart Hulga, who was fooled and left to decease in the wilderness with her unreal leg stolen by that “ male child ” .

In the short narrative “ A Rose for Emily ” William Faulkner shows the action from assorted points of position. Though the ideas of the chief character of the narrative, Miss Emily Grierson, are hidden from our cognition, we can detect the scene from the points of position of authorities officers and her neighbours and townsmen. That attack makes us believe, retracing the existent image of motivations beneath miss Emily ‘s actions.

The authorities functionaries came to her house to garner her debt for the metropolis but were turned away by Miss Emily. After that, they left the thought they can acquire anything from her at all. After the decease of her male parent, she became a pauper immediately. After that, she seldom left her house for long. The townsmen and her neighbours began to feel for her, because she was so hapless, lonely and forlorn. As it is said in the narrative:

The twenty-four hours after his decease all the ladies prepared to name at the house and offer commiseration and assistance, as is our usage Miss Emily met them at the door, dressed as usual and with no hint of heartache on her face. She told them that her male parent was non dead. She did that for three yearss, with the curates naming on her, and the physicians, seeking to carry her to allow them dispose of the organic structure. Merely as they were approximately to fall back to jurisprudence and force, she broke down, and they buried her father rapidly. ( Faulkner, 1930 )

That merely shows Miss Emily was non in a stable mental status even so. It added even more sentiments to the feeling of her neighbours. Her love affair with Homer Barron, “ a large, dark, ready adult male, with a large voice and eyes lighter than his face ” ( Faulkner, 1930 ) , was regarded by the looker-ons as positive and they thought that Emily and Homer would shortly get married. After they came to cognize that Homer liked work forces, neighbours still had a strong belief that Emily could carry him to get married. And so it seemed, because:

We learned that Miss Emily had been to the jewelry maker ‘s and ordered a adult male ‘s lavatory set in Ag, with the letters H. B. on each piece. Two yearss subsequently we learned that she had bought a complete outfit of work forces ‘s vesture, including a nightshirt, and we said, “ They are married. ( Faulkner, 1930 )

And cipher could think why she had bought arsenic. In the terminal of the narrative, when Miss Emily dies in old age, we come to cognize the existent destiny of Homer Barron. He was poisoned with arsenic by Miss Emily. It is non clear, why she did it, but judging from her mental province we can think that it may hold happened because Emily was insane. Poor Emilyaˆ¦

In Kafka ‘s “ Metamorphosis ” there are two chief subjects. Both of them are connected to the relationship between Gregor Samsa and his household. The first is separation of an person from the remainder of the society. Indeed, a immature adult male Gregor sacrifices his personal felicity to the cause of paying off his parents ‘ debt to his foreman. He works hard on a Canis familiaris ‘s occupation of a going salesman, traveling from one hotel to another, from solitariness to solitariness. Even when at place, he closes all doors taking to his room ( he says it was a “ cautious wont, acquired from his traveling ” ( Kafka, 1915 ) ) , we can see him seting every bit much infinite between himself and his household, which is of all time in demand of money. Money, which cipher in that household, except Gregor, earns. For we see no other member of the Samsa household at work in the narrative. His feeling of disaffection is so deep that it turns him into a elephantine bug. But, as it can be easy predicted, it turns his household aside of him even more than earlier. They do n’t necessitate Gregor, they need his money to populate as they are used to. When he became badly, the lone concern of the household was to acquire rid of him:

How can that be Gregor? If it were Gregor he would hold seen long ago that it ‘s non possible for human existences to populate with an animate being like that and he would hold gone of his ain free will. We would n’t hold a brother any more, so, but we could transport on with our lives and retrieve him with regard. ( Kafka, 1915 )

The 2nd subject is sense of guilt. When Gregor is turned into a bug, his lone ideas are of his household: “ Well, there ‘s still some hope ; one time I ‘ve got the money together to pay off my parents ‘ debt to him – another five or six old ages I suppose – that ‘s decidedly what I ‘ll make. That ‘s when I ‘ll do the large alteration ” ( Kafka,1915 ) . There is no self-pity in him, merely concern for his household ‘s well-being. Guilt is killing him. He dies entirely and deserted, and that for the interest of his household: “ Then, without his willing it, his caput sank down wholly, and his last breath flowed weakly from his anterior nariss ” ( Kafka, 1915 ) . So ends the tragic narrative of a worthy immature adult male named Gregor Samsa.