Constantinople and Tenochtitlan were two great metropoliss in their clip. They both had many dominant physical characteristics. They besides had many cultural influences and their major map for each metropolis was different. The two metropoliss had of import landmarks and their locations still exist. The metropoliss both had spiritual associations and other of import facets. Constantinople and Tenochtitlan help to demo you what metropoliss were like between 1160-1520.
Any two metropoliss could hold been chosen to demo what it was like back so. These two show the planetary nature of this happening by contrasting the two. One is located in the Mediterranean and the other is in Mesoamerica so they are fundamentally worlds apart. They besides experience two different sorts of life. These two were besides chosen to be compared because many of the Europeans went to these topographic points and made their ain accountable comparings on what they had thought.
Each metropolis had its ain dominant physical features. Constantinople had St. Sophia and the hippodrome. It besides had comfortable houses and markets. Constantinople was in the centre for trading on the Silk Road. It besides had a great defence system because the metropolis was surrounded by H2O. The metropolis had the Old Horn Port on one of its borders. Tenochtitlan was built up in the fens. The metropolis besides had particular roads to link it to the mainland. Each metropolis had its manner of populating with their physical characteristics.
Constantinople and Tenochtitlan each had its ain set of cultural influences. Constantinople was largely Roman and Greek. They chiefly spoke Greek at that place. They were besides Christian Orthodox. Tenochtitlan was built by the inspiration of two older metropoliss. The immigrants and visitants that came had to remain in their ain vicinities. They besides traded with the North and South. Constantinople and Tenochtitlan were influenced by their civilizations.
The major map for each metropolis was different from each other. Constantinople was used as a political topographic point. It was besides really spiritual. Istanbul was besides a major trade centre. Tenochtitlan was chiefly a spiritual centre. It had different ritual forfeits that went on. It besides had a batch of spiritual ceremonials that went on. They both had different maps.
The metropoliss had many of import landmarks and their locations still exist. Constantinople had St. Sophia every bit good as the Mese Road or “Midway” . The Aureate Gate was besides located at that place. Other topographic points located here are the Golden Horn and the Hippodrome. Tenochtitlan had the Pyramid of the Sun. They besides had the Market. Old Horn Port is still around today. Tenochtitlan stood where present twenty-four hours Mexico City is. Each metropolis had its ain set of of import topographic points and each are still around in some manner.
Each metropolis had its ain spiritual associations. Constantinople was centered around the Orthodox Church. Tenochtitlan had many things that were spiritual. They had forfeits in their metropolis. They besides had many Supreme beings and were polytheistic. Tenochtitlan besides had many priests and a head to look up to. Constantinople and Tenochtitlan had their ain manner of believing in their faiths.
Constantinople and Tenochtitlan besides had some other of import features. Constantinople was highly affluent. They besides had inhabitant Greeks that were non made for war. The linguistic communication of Tenochtitlan was Nahuatl. They besides had a population of two hundred 1000s. Their metropolis was built by the Aztecs. The two metropoliss had many of import features.
Most Europeans had their portion in thee diminution of both of these metropoliss. Many topographic points say that their faiths had an affect on their force. They both had an compulsion for gold and other affluent stuff. They each had a large population for their clip. Many believed that because of their great and different urban development went good with the fact that they had a modern economic development. Both were built in imitation of older metropoliss and more well-known centres. They both were known more as imperial capitals. but now they are frequently referred to as metropoliss. Constantinople was older. but its became more celebrated as a Roman capital subsequently in history. Tenochtitlan was a younger metropolis and rapidly grew from a little topographic point into the largest metropolis of the Americas as their enlargement of power grew over all of Mesoamerica.
Constantinople and Tenochtitlan helped to show how metropoliss developed and what their lives were like back so when they were developing metropoliss. They both had their ain set of physical features. They besides had their ain portion of cultural influences and what their major map for their metropolis was. Constantinople and Tenochtitlan had of import landmarks within each of their metropolis bounds and the site for their locations are still around in some signifier. They besides had their ain spiritual beliefs and ways of life. They besides had some other of import facets to their metropoliss to distinct themselves from other metropoliss. Constantinople and Tenochtitlan were classified as a metropolis. but do you think they could hold become more than that?
Wiesner. Wheeler. Doeringer. Curtis. Detecting The Global Past. Houghton Mifflin Company ; New York: 2007. Pages 268-300.
Beginning 4. Illustrated Map of Constantinople. thirteenth Century Source 5. Interior Saint Sophia Source 10. Spanish Illustrated Map of Tenochtitlan