The crucible and hamlet

Posted on

In The Crucible and Hamlet, the chief subjects of use, aspiration and faith are used often. However, these subjects are found in either the initial struggle, flood tide or struggle declaration for the dramas. The initial struggle reflects the subject of aspiration, use starts to neglect during the flood tide, and faith is a common subject throughout both dramas but can be seen during the struggle declaration. In The Crucible, Abigail is considered to be the adversary and in Hamlet, the scoundrel is Claudius who kills his brother in order to go King. Both these characters put to utilize these subjects, and have many things in common in footings of their ends. Three chief subjects are found common between the adversaries of both dramas, and finally, they intertwine with one another.

Manipulation plays a great function in both The Crucible and Hamlet. Claudius was the most manipulative character in Hamlet, he was the adversary. Abigail from The Crucible was besides the scoundrel and adversary in the drama and was non able to run into her end end merely like Claudius. The endeavoring King manipulated the people of him utilizing his singular linguistic communication and address which he used as his arm. He used his linguistic communication to carry the people of the land that he is a baronial and loyal King ; besides, he used this to pull strings Gertrude into believing that he is a good adult male and can replace her hubby. In The Crucible, Abigail besides has a arm, nevertheless it is non like the one Claudius has. Abigail has leverage against Proctor. Thus, Abigail uses Proctors adultery as influence over John and uses it to pull strings the full town. The lone people who know the adversaries true purposes are the supporters of the narrative. The quotation mark “ A liquidator and a scoundrel, / A slave that is non 20th portion the tith/ Of your case in point Godhead, a frailty of male monarchs, / a pickpocket of the imperium and the rule/ that from a shelf the cherished crown stole, / And set it in his pocket- ” ( Shakespeare, act 3, scene 4 ) , was said by Hamlet while speaking to Gertrude and converting her that Claudius is non the individual she thinks he is. He says that Claudius is a liquidator and he was able to take the throne by stealing utilizing his manipulative powers. The lone two people who knew who Abigail truly was, was John Proctor and Elizabeth Proctor, the audience sees this when Proctor says, “ She thinks to dance with me on my married woman ‘s grave! And good she might, for I thought of her softly. God aid me, I lusted, and there is a promise in such perspiration. But it is a prostitute ‘s retribution, and you must see it. “ ( Miller,73 ) .

The subject of aspiration is recognized in the initial struggle of both narratives. The initial struggle in Hamlet was the sighting of the shade, when Hamlet finds out what happened to Hamlet Sr. , his male parent, the audience understands how ambitious Claudius truly is. Claudius would make perfectly anything to keep his power, so the audience understands, because it is said that he killed his brother in order to go King. The initial struggle in The Crucible is when the misss were dancing in the forests the audience sees that she would cuss merely to be with him. Abigail ‘s chief aim is to be with John Proctor. She was the cause of the deceases of guiltless people in the town. Claudius killed his brother for his aim and Abigail had no job killing guiltless people of Salem merely so she could be with John. Claudius knew what he did was incorrect but can non come to acknowledge it to others. His aspiration blurred his ability to acknowledge and take the incrimination for the decease of his brother. In act 3, scene 3, he reflects on his guilt, ” My mistake is past. But oh, what signifier of prayer/ Can function my bend, ‘Forgive me my disgusting slaying ‘ ? ” ( Shakespeare, Scene 3 Act 3 ) . We do non see this signifier of confession about her wrong-doings from Abigail. She was at that place to finish her end, and was non able to make so ; therefore, she ended up go forthing Salem.

Religion plays a great function in both narratives, we see this peculiarly in Hamlet. Claudius goes into confession to reflect on his wickednesss, which is dry because if he cared so much about cleansing his psyche, why would he perpetrate slaying in the first topographic point? At the most, he should acknowledge to his guilt and trade with the effects. However, in his confession we see that he can non convey himself to vacate his assets, he says, “ I am still possessed/ of those effects for which I did the slaying, / my Crown, mine ain aspiration and my queen. ” ( Shakespeare, Act 3, Scene 3 ) . In the Crucible, society is so certain about the being of the Satan, and they are all spiritual, hence, Abigail uses faith to acquire what she wanted. She knew that if she used faith, she would hold an consequence on society as a whole. Which she tries to make by stating that she is associated with the Devil.

In decision, the chief subjects of use, faith and aspiration play a great function in Hamlet and The Crucible. These three subjects are common in the adversaries of the dramas and besides are found in either the initial struggle, flood tide or struggle declaration. In both dramas, the supporters know the truth behind everything. Claudius on occasion showed marks of guilt every bit good as marks of love towards Gertrude. However, Abigail merely showed marks of love toward John Proctor, and throughout the narrative there are no marks of human feeling from her. All these subjects are intertwined with one another. In the Crucible, Abigail uses faith as a signifier of use to achieve her end. In Hamlet, aspiration causes the decease of Claudius ‘ brother, which consequences in him pull stringsing Gertrude and the land, and finally allows him to demo human feelings in confession. Therefore, the audience notices that both adversaries portion common subjects that occurred in each drama.