The Ramayana Essay

Posted on

The Ramayana: Anthropomorphism of the Divine

Possibly no individual work of prose gaining controls the comprehensiveness and deepness of the significance of the word Dharma. than does the Ramayana. Not a spiritual book or divinely divine text such as the Bible or Quran. the Ramayana was originally an heroic poem verse form that circulated for centuries by word of oral cavity before being written down. and therefore expanded and contracted over the millenary in written signifier. dance. vocals. films and telecasting series across a big part of Asia. As such there is no perfectly right or true version. but the general narrative is one of good vs. immorality. depicting in dramatic manner the virtuous and merely behaviour of the transcendent Rama. necessarily lifting triumphantly after a series of inductions. trials. treachery and fraudulence. It has given Indians a antic illustration of extraordinary behaviour under utmost fortunes. but besides provides ideals and wisdom for common day-to-day life. Take this illustration from the beginning. when the sage Viswamithra convinces Rama’s male parent. King Dasaratha to let his boy to go with him on a potentially unsafe journey ; “You can non number on the physical propinquity of person you love. all the clip. A seed that sprouts at the pes of its parent tree remains stunted until it is transplanted…Every human being. when the clip comes. has to go and seek his fulfilment in his ain manner. ” ( Narayan 1972. 9 )

The above provides but one illustration from the Ramayana’s simple yet pure message that all categories. all castes can appreciate. It is a narrative that provides context for the construct of Dharma ; it shows how a God ( s ) in human signifier furnishes examples full with compassion. justness. bravery. trueness. heroism. altruism and selflessness. The construct of a God leting himself to be born mortal in order to free the universe of immorality is non sole to the western universe. This paper will take a casual expression at this fabulous narrative as an theanthropism of the Godhead supplying a theoretical account to retroflex. specifically the relationships between kids and parents. hubbies and married womans. and swayers and topics.

As a boy. Rama demonstrates the ideal executing of his Dharma at the petition of Kaikeyi. his stepmother when she has him banished to the wood for 14 old ages. renouncing the throne as King of Ayodhya following his father’s subjective retirement. He does non demo letdown when his stepmother speaks on his father’s behalf. saying how it is Rama’s responsibility to carry through his father’s promise to her. “otherwise he ( Dasaratha ) will be cursing himself in this and other universes. You owe him a responsibility as his boy. ” ( Narayan 1972. 45 ) At this Rama internalizes the initial daze of being removed as inheritor. expelled from his land. with lone bark for vesture. Knowing his male parent is broken hearted by his wife’s apparently undue and irrational petition. Rama however regards it as if he were commanded by his male parent. and provinces “I want you to cognize I am non in the least offended by this order. I will take your word as his. ” ( Narayan 1972. 45 ) Without ailment or outward show of disappointment Rama alternatively demonstrates grace and self-respect. even as those around him are emotionally crushed and outraged at the bend of events. His birth female parent shortness of breath uncontrollably and admirations aloud at what discourtesy he must hold committed to warrant what appears to be a penalty. Rama’s younger brother Lakshmana is so angered he dons his arms and equipment for conflict. and swears to destruct anyone trying to halt his brother from being king ; “I’ll non yield or give to the desire of a mere female…” ( Narayan 1972. 51 ) . Rama takes the proverbial high route with his female parent and brother. and alternatively places the incrimination on himself for accepting the offer of the throne so readily and reminds his brother that he should non be so irresponsible with his choler. “you must non express such acrimonious comments about people who after all are none other than your male parent and female parent. ” ( Narayan 1972. 51 ) Through grace and repose does Rama separate himself from those whom demonstrate natural behaviour in visible radiation of the fortunes ; he reminds his brother of his narration of the Vedas and the illustrations of a reverent life to antagonize his unreason. This full chapter in the Ramayana highlights the complete subordination of a kid to his parents. and conformity to their wants. Rama himself states that these are higher than demands of a male monarch ( Bharatha ) . or a guru ( Vasishtha ) and there could be no word higher than that of a male parent ; no behavior other than obeisance to it ( Narayan 1972. 60 ) .

In the instance of hubbies and married womans in the Ramayana. possibly it is the relationship of Rama and Sita that form the true footing for this narrative. Bing the incarnate of Vishnu and Lakshmi. these two were apparently made for one another and even though it was customary for male monarchs to hold many married womans. Rama told Sita that he would predate this usage. In return. when Rama is later dispatched for 14 old ages from Ayodhya. he tells Sita that it is non her duty to give up her life in the castle and he will return to her. Without vacillation she states that her topographic point is by his side wherever he may be…”it will be a living decease for me without you ; a wood or a marble castle is all the same to me. ” ( Narayan 1972. 52 ) 1This faithfulness towards her hubby demonstrates the truest virtuousness of an Indian adult female ; although she is afraid to go forth the castle she follows unimpeachably. When Soorpanaka appears to Rama he was stunned by her beauty ; “her eyes flashed. dentitions sparkled. her figure. waist and bosom were that of a well-defined figure” ( Narayan 1972. 64 ) but he would non accept her as a married woman even though she all but throws herself at him and attempts urgently to score him. Of class he has none of it. and his brother Lakshmana disposes of her. about killing her if it were non her being a adult female. Following Sita’s gaining control by Ravana. Rama makes Alliess with Sugreeva. and during a conflict with Vila his brother ( who regulations the elephantine monkey race ) . mortally wounds him with an pointer. Diing. Vila inquiries why he sided with Sugreeva. and why he attacked him. In response Rama once more gives penetration to the hubby and married woman relationship ; “you violated his wife’s award and made her your ain. Guarding a woman’s award is the first responsibility laid on any intelligent being. ” ( Narayan 1972. 102 ) . This sketch is of import as it shows that the monkey race of existences from Kiskinda are capable to the same ethical codifications as human society ; of class this is correspondent to the Shudras or provincials of the caste system. The lessons of the Ramayana are applicable across the deepness of the Varna caste system.

Finally. the Ramayana offers a theoretical account of virtuousnesss and the construct of servitude for swayers sing their topics that exemplify what should be. as opposed to what is. After governing for an untold figure of old ages Dasaratha decides it is clip to release his throne to Rama. his oldest boy. He notifies his assembly of this determination. and describes the qualities his boy possesses ; He is perfect and will be a perfect swayer. He has compassion. a sense of justness and bravery. and he makes no differentiations between human beings- old or immature. prince or provincial ; he has the same consideration for everyone. In bravery. heroism. and all the qualities—none equal to him. He will be your best defender from any hostile force. be it human. subhuman or superhman…I hope I shall hold your support in anointing him instantly as Emperor of Kosala. ” ( Narayan 1972. 34 )

Appropriately. following this address the assembly let out a ‘joyous shout’ and a spokesman tells Dasaratha they have been long waiting for this minute. The quotation mark above could be applied to a male parent and his kids every bit readily as a male monarch to his people ; interestingly enough the great general Sun Tzu promoted handling his ain soldiers as his darling boies to transfuse trueness. Undoubtedly the true step of a great leader is animating trueness over allegiance. and the Ramayana high spots this once more when Dasaratha speaks straight to Rama prior to taking over ; “You will hold to prosecute a policy of absolute justness under all fortunes. Humility and soft speech—there could truly be no bound to these virtuousnesss. There can be no topographic point in a king’s bosom for lecherousness. choler. or beastliness. ” ( Narayan 1972. 35 ) It is stating that in Thailand over the past two centuries nine male monarchs have called themselves Rama ; in award of a fictional character no less!

The Ramayana offers an idyllic position of a close perfect clip and topographic point. where all peoples knew their places in society and acted in conformity with Dharma. The antic characters offer the really best and really worst in human nature. magnified by godlike powers and abilities to turn out their extraordinary character as ethical ( or unethical ) existences. It does non represent a spring of logic to see how Rama evolved into a Godhead being over the centuries. from fabulous character to a adored embodiment of Vishnu. Regardless. this narrative has withstood the trial of clip and remains an of import portion of literature for great multitudes of people in Asia. The Ramayana constitutes the most readily consumable and most appealing illustration of Dharma for its abiding audience.

Narayan. R. K. . 1972. The Ramayana: A Sawed-off Modern Prose Version of the Indian Epic. New York: A Penguin book